Using time domain reflectometry for monitoring mineralization of nitrogen from soil organic matter

Citation
S. De Neve et al., Using time domain reflectometry for monitoring mineralization of nitrogen from soil organic matter, EUR J SO SC, 51(2), 2000, pp. 295-304
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
13510754 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
295 - 304
Database
ISI
SICI code
1351-0754(200006)51:2<295:UTDRFM>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The mineralization of nitrogen from soil organic matter is important when o ne tries to optimize nitrogen fertilization and assess risks of N losses to the environment, but its measurement is laborious and expensive. We have e xplored the possibilities for monitoring N mineralization directly using ti me domain reflectometry (TDR). Net N and S mineralization were monitored ov er a 101-day period in two layers (0-30 and 30-60 cm) of a loamy sand soil during aerobic incubation in a laboratory experiment. At the same time elec trical conductivity of the bulk soil, sigma(a), was measured by TDR. A seri es of calibration measurements with different amounts of KNO3 at different soil moisture contents was made with the topsoil to calculate the electrica l conductivity, sigma(w), of the soil solution from sigma(a) and theta. The actual sigma(w) was determined from the conductivity of 1:2 soil:water ext racts (sigma(1:2)) with a mass balance approach using measured NO3- concent rations, after correction for ions present prior to the addition of KNO3. T he average N mineralization rate in the topsoil was small (0.12 mg N kg(-1) day(-1)), and, as expected, very small in the subsoil (0.023 mg N kg(-1) d ay(-1)). In the top layer NO3- concentrations calculated from sigma(a) dete rmined by TDR slightly underestimated measured concentrations in the first 4 weeks, and in the second half of the incubation there was a significant o verestimation of measured NO3-. Using the sum of both measured NO3- and SO4 2- reduced the overestimation. In the subsoil calculated NO3- concentration s strongly and consistently overestimated measured concentrations, although both followed the same trend. As S mineralization in the subsoil was very small, and initial SO42- concentrations were largely taken into account in the calibration relations, SO42- concentrations could not explain the overe stimation. The very small NO3- and SO42- concentrations in the B layer, at the lower limit of the concentrations used in the calibrations, are a possi ble explanation for the discrepancies. A separate calibration for the subso il could also be required to improve estimates of NO3- concentrations.