Hi. Hendolin et al., Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: A prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response, EURO J SURG, 166(5), 2000, pp. 394-399
Objective: Open cholecystectomy (OC) has been superseded by laparoscopic ch
olecystectomy (LC) for the treatment of cholelithiasis, although this fashi
on has not been validated by prospective studies. Our aim was to compare th
e two techniques.
Design: Prospective, randomised, open study. Setting: University hospital,
Finland.
Patients: 49 patients who required cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis confi
rmed by ultrasound.
Interventions: 49 patients were randomly allocated to LC (n = 27) or OC (n
= 22): 25 and 22, respectively, eventually had the operation. LC was done u
sing a four-trocar technique, and OC through a transverse right subcostal i
ncision, as short as possible.
Main outcome measures: Length of hospital stay and the duration of the sick
leave were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were:
postoperative pain evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the need fo
r opioids; pulmonary function measured by forced vital capacity (FVC), forc
ed expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak flow velocity (PEFV), and a
rterial oxygen tension (PaO2), and endocrine stress measured by plasma cate
cholamines, cortisol and glucose concentrations.
Results: The median (range) hospital stay was significantly shorter after L
C than OC, being 2.0 (1-15) compared with 4.5 (2-19) days p < 0.01. The dur
ation of sick leave was also significantly shorter after LC than OC, bring
14 (7-17) compared with 29 (4-34), p, < 0.01. Patients had significantly le
ss postoperative pain after LC than OC as reflected by the need for opioids
. Pulmonary function and arterial oxygen tension deteriorated significantly
less after LC than OC. The stress response was equal. There were three doc
umented complications, one pneumonia after LC and two wound infections afte
r OC.
Conclusions: LC gives significantly better results in terms of less postope
rative pain, better pulmonary function, better arterial oxygenation, and sh
orter hospital stay and duration of sick leave.