Functional adaptation of reactive saccades in humans: a PET study

Citation
M. Desmurget et al., Functional adaptation of reactive saccades in humans: a PET study, EXP BRAIN R, 132(2), 2000, pp. 243-259
Citations number
95
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00144819 → ACNP
Volume
132
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
243 - 259
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(200005)132:2<243:FAORSI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
It is known that the saccadic system shows adaptive changes when the comman d sent to the extraocular muscles is inappropriate. Despite an abundance of supportive psychophysical investigations, the neurophysiological substrate of this process is still debated. The present study addresses this issue u sing (H2O)-O-15 positron emission tomography (PET). We contrasted three con ditions in which healthy human subjects were required to perform saccadic e ye movements toward peripheral visual targets. Two conditions involved a mo dification of the target location during the course of the initial saccade, when there is suppression of visual perception. In the RAND condition, int ra-saccadic target displacement was random from trial-to-trial, precluding any systematic modification of the primary saccade amplitude. In the ADAPT condition, intra-saccadic target displacement was uniform, causing adaptive modification of the primary saccade amplitude. In the third condition (sta tionary, STAT), the target remained at the same location during the entire trial. Difference images reflecting regional cerebral-blood-flow changes at tributable to the process of saccadic adaptation (ADAPT minus RAND; ADAPT m inus STAT) showed a selective activation in the oculomotor cerebellar vermi s (OCV; lobules VI and VII). This finding is consistent with neurophysiolog ical studies in monkeys. Additional analyses indicated that the cerebellar activation was not related to kinematic factors, and that the absence of si gnificant activation within the frontal eye fields (FEF) or the superior co lliculus (SC) did not represent a false negative inference. Besides the con tribution of the OCV to saccadic adaptation, we also observed, in the RAND condition, that the saccade amplitude was significantly larger when the pre vious trial involved a forward jump than when the previous trial involved a backward jump. This observation indicates that saccade accuracy is constan tly monitored on a trial-to-trial basis. Behavioral measurements and PET ob servations (RAND minus STAT) suggest that this single-trial control of sacc ade amplitude may be functionally distinct from the process of saccadic ada ptation.