Cognitive/perceptual, physiological, and behavioral correlates of ange
r discussion were examined in a sample of 461 health fair participants
at a southeastern university. Subjects who usually discussed their an
ger differed significantly from those who did not in systolic blood pr
essure, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, aerobic exercise, p
erceived importance of health, and perceived health status. Zn gender-
specific correlational analyses, discussion of anger was inversely rel
ated to women's global assessment of stress and to their levels of per
ceived stress at home and at work. This study suggests that talking ab
out anger may be a health-promoting alternative to suppressing it or v
enting it outwardly after a provocation. Gender differences and implic
ations for practice are discussed. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders
Company.