Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. 1: The roles of agriculture and forestry

Citation
Ra. Houghton et Jl. Hackler, Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. 1: The roles of agriculture and forestry, GLOBAL EC B, 9(2), 2000, pp. 125-144
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
ISSN journal
09607447 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
125 - 144
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-7447(200003)9:2<125:CITCSI>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
1 Changes in the areas of croplands and pastures, and rates of wood harvest in seven regions of the United States, including Alaska, were derived from historical statistics for the period 1700-1990. These rates of land-use ch ange were used in a cohort model, together with equations defining the chan ges in live vegetation, slash, wood products and soil that follow a change in land use, to calculate the annual flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use. 2 The calculated flux increased from less than 10 TgC/yr in 1700 to a maxim um of about 400 TgC/yr around 1880 and then decreased to approximately zero by 1950. The total flux for the 290-year period was a release of 32.6 PgC. The area of forests and woodlands declined by 42% (160 x 10(6) ha), releas ing 29 PgC, or 90% of the total flux. Cultivation of soils accounted for ab out 25% of the carbon loss. Between 1950 and 1990 the annual flux of carbon was approximately zero, although eastern forests were accumulating carbon. 3 When the effects of fire and fire exclusion (reported in a companion pape r) were added to this analysis of land-use change, the uptake of carbon cal culated for forests was similar in magnitude to the uptake measured in fore st inventories, suggesting that past harvests account for a significant fra ction of the observed carbon sink in forests. 4 Changes in the management of croplands between 1965 and 1990 may have led to an additional accumulation of carbon, not included in the 32.6 PgC rele ase, but even with this additional non-forest sink, the calculated accumula tion of carbon in the United States was an order of magnitude smaller than the North American carbon sink inferred recently from atmospheric data and models.