Jr. Barnett et al., Holes in the safety net? Assessing the effects of targeted benefits upon the health care utilization of poor New Zealanders, HEAL SOC C, 8(3), 2000, pp. 159-171
This paper examines the issue of targeting primary health-care benefits in
favour of low-income recipients and other high users of health care. Specif
ically we examine the New Zealand case where, despite the introduction of s
uch benefits in 1992, financial barriers appear to remain a significant det
erminant of utilization. We address this issue through a case study conduct
ed in the city of Christchurch. Through a survey-based research design, we
seek to determine the extent to which price barriers remain important by co
mparing patient utilization of a free community health clinic (n = 202) wit
h a low-income control sample of patients who continue to use conventional
(for New Zealand) fee-for-service providers (n = 148). We found that a larg
e proportion of respondents delayed seeking care because of cost. Further,f
or respondents using the fee-for-service providers, levels of use were not
related to need, whereas at the free clinic there was an inverse relationsh
ip between income and consultation rates. We conclude that if a universalit
y of benefits is not possible, then there is a need for better targeting of
primary care benefits. We believe there is a danger in such. initiatives b
eing evaluated primarily in terms of their validity as funding mechanisms,
rather than in terms of their success in meeting the health-care needs of t
he disdavantaged.