A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of citalopram compared to mianserin in elderly, depressed patients with or without mild to moderate dementia
I. Karlsson et al., A randomised, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of citalopram compared to mianserin in elderly, depressed patients with or without mild to moderate dementia, INT J GER P, 15(4), 2000, pp. 295-305
Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder among the elderly and in
old age may interact with emotional and cognitive functioning. Depression
in old age has been shown to be associated with degenerative changes in the
brain. It is, therefore, important that in this patient population antidep
ressants with a favourable tolerability profile, such as the selective sero
tonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are examined for both antidepressant eff
icacy and effect on cognitive function and emotional impairment. This rando
mised, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of citalop
ram and mianserin in 336 elderly, depressed patients with or without dement
ia. Patients received either citalopram 20-40 mg/day or mianserin 30-60 mg/
day for 12 weeks. The treatments were equivalent with respect to change in
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score; patients in
both treatment groups responded well. Patients with dementia showed a small
er decrease in total MADRS score than patients without dementia. Both treat
ments were well tolerated with a relatively low incidence of adverse events
. Fatigue and somnolence were more frequent with mianserin, while insomnia
was more frequent with citalopram. Overall, this study showed that the two
treatments were equivalent in efficacy, and that citalopram is an effective
, well-tolerated and non-sedative treatment for elderly depressed patients
with or without dementia. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.