A pilot study of preoperative continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, externalmicrowave hyperthermia, and external beam radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer
Ms. Anscher et al., A pilot study of preoperative continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, externalmicrowave hyperthermia, and external beam radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer, INT J RAD O, 47(3), 2000, pp. 719-724
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To determine the feasibility of combining external beam radiothera
py, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and external microwave hyper
thermia in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent adeno
carcinoma of the rectum.
Methods and Materials: From 7/95 through 2/99, 15 patients were enrolled in
the study. The treatment regimen consisted of continuous infusion 5-FU 250
mg/m(2)/d 7 days/week beginning on day 1, external beam radiotherapy to th
e pelvis, 4500 cGy, 180 cGy/d 5 days/week using a 3 or ii-field technique,
and external microwave hyperthermia on days 3, 8, 15, 22, and 29, Chemother
apy was stopped on the last day of radiotherapy. Surgical resection, if fea
sible, was scheduled 3-6 weeks after completing thermochemoradiotherapy. Fo
r this regimen to be considered feasible, no more than 2 of the 15 patients
should fail to complete therapy due to life-threatening toxicity. Toxicity
was scored using National Cancer Institute Criteria.
Results: All patients completed the chemoradiotherapy portion of the protoc
ol. Eleven of the 15 patients completed all 5 hyperthermia treatments. Of t
he 4 patients who did not receive the full course of hyperthermia, only 1 p
atient had treatment stopped due to life threatening toxicity. The other 3
patients did not complete hyperthermia due to scheduling errors (n = 2) or
patient request (n = 1). Five of 15 patients required a treatment interrupt
ion due to toxicity greater than or equal to Grade 3. Seven patients experi
enced lesser degrees of toxicity which did not require treatment interrupti
on. Three patients experienced no side effects. The most common toxicities
were dermatitis and diarrhea. Of the 14 patients in whom surgery was planne
d, 11 (79%) were resectable. There was one pathologic complete response.
Conclusions: It is feasible to deliver thermochemoradiotherapy, as prescrib
ed in this study, to patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or recur
rent rectal cancer. The therapy is moderately toxic, with one-third of pati
ents requiring temporary treatment interruptions. The regimen appears activ
e against rectal cancer, and appears to warrant further consideration as a
treatment option for this patient population. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc
.