Gc. Bentel et al., Variability of the depth of supraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: Is a posterior axillary boost field necessary?, INT J RAD O, 47(3), 2000, pp. 755-758
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To determine the variability of the depth of supraclavicular (SC)
and axillary (AX) lymph nodes in patients undergoing radiation therapy for
breast cancer and to relate this variability with the patient's anterior/po
sterior (AIP) diameter. The dosimetric consequences of the variability in d
epth are explored and related to the need for a posterior axillary boost fi
eld.
Method and Materials: In 49 patients undergoing treatment-planning computed
tomography (CT) scanning in the treatment position, the maximum depth of t
he SC and AX lymph nodes was measured on CT images. The A/P diameter was me
asured at the location of the SC and AX, respectively. The relationship bet
ween the SC/AX lymph node depth and patient diameter was determined using l
inear regression. For an anterior SC and AX field, the relative dose to the
SC and AX lymph nodes were calculated for a 6 MV photon beam.
Results: The maximum depth of the SC lymph nodes ranged from 2.4 to 9.5 cm
(median, 4.3 cm). The depth was less than 3 cm in 4 patients, 3-6 cm in 39
(80%), and greater than 6 cm in 6 patients. There was a linear relationship
between the SC lymph node depth and the A/P diameter. The depth of the SC
lymph nodes in cm equals approximately one-half of the A/P diameter minus 3
.5 (r(2) = 0.69). In 94% (46 of 49) of patients, the SC lymph node depth wa
s between one-fifth and one-half of the A/P diameter. The depth of the axil
lary lymph nodes ranged from 1.4 to 8 cm (median, 4.3 cm). The depth was le
ss than 3 cm in 8 patients, 3-6 cm in 32 (65%), and greater than 6 cm in 9
patients. The AX lymph node depth in cm equals approximately one-half of th
e A/P diameter minus 3 (r(2) = 0.81). In all patients, the AX lymph nodes w
ere shallower than mid-depth.
The depth of the SC and AX lymph nodes was within a +/-1 cm in 53% (26 of 4
9) of patients. The AX Lymph nodes were located at greater than or equal to
1 cm shallower or greater depth than the SC in 24.5% (12 of 49) and 22.5%
(11 of 49) of patients, respectively. If an anterior 6-MV beam only is used
to treat the SC and AX lymph nodes in these 49 patients, the dose to the A
X is within a +/- 5% of the SC dose in 53% (26 of 49) patients and is 90% o
r more of the dose delivered in the SC in 90% (44 of 49) of patients.
Conclusion: The maximum depth of the SC and AX lymph nodes varies widely an
d is related to the patient's size represented by the A/P diameter. In most
patients, the AX lymph nodes lie at approximately the same depth or shallo
wer than the SC. Therefore, the rationale for a posterior axillary boost fi
eld needs to be further assessed. When the AX and SC lymph nodes are deep,
opposed supraclavicular and axillary fields and/or the use of a higher ener
gy beam might be reasonable. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.