A randomised controlled trial of lay health workers as direct observers for treatment of tuberculosis

Citation
M. Zwarenstein et al., A randomised controlled trial of lay health workers as direct observers for treatment of tuberculosis, INT J TUBE, 4(6), 2000, pp. 550-554
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE
ISSN journal
10273719 → ACNP
Volume
4
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
550 - 554
Database
ISI
SICI code
1027-3719(200006)4:6<550:ARCTOL>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
SETTING: Study conducted in a suburb of Cape Town, South Africa. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of successful tuberculosis treatment outcome rates be tween self supervision, supervision by lay health worker (LHW), and supervi sion by clinic nurse. METHODS: Open, randomised, controlled trial with intention-re-treat analysi s. RESULTS: All groups (n = 156) achieved similar outcomes (LHW vs. clinic nur se: risk difference 17.2%, 95% confidence interval ICI] -0.1-34.5; LHW vs. self supervision 15%, 95% CI -3.7-33.6). New patients benefit from LHW supe rvision (LHW vs clinic nurse: risk difference 24.2%, 95% CI 6-42.5, LHW vs. self supervision 39.1%, 95% CI 17.8-60.3) as do female patients (LHW vs. c linic nurse 48.3%, 95% CI 22.8-73.8, LHW vs. self supervision 32.6%, 95% CI 6.4-58.7). CONCLUSIONS: LHW supervision approaches statistically significant superiori ty, but fails to reach it most likely due to the study's limitation, the sm all sample size. It is possible that subgroups (new and female patients) do well under LHW supervision. LHW supervision could be offered as one of sev eral supervision options within TB control programmes.