Ee. Birch et al., Co-development of VEP motion response and binocular vision in normal infants and infantile esotropes, INV OPHTH V, 41(7), 2000, pp. 1719-1723
PURPOSE. To determine the maturational course of nasotemporal asymmetry in
infantile esotropia and to define the relationships among the symmetry of t
he motion visual evoked potential (MVEP), eye alignment, fusion, and stereo
psis.
METHODS. Sixty healthy term infants and 34 infants with esotropia participa
ted. Nasotemporal MVEP asymmetry was assessed by the presence of a signific
ant F-1 response component with an interocular phase difference of approxim
ately 180 degrees and by an amplitude "asymmetry index." Fusion was evaluat
ed using the 4 p.d. base out prism test. Random dot stereoacuity was assess
ed in infants with forced-choice preferential looking: (FPL) using the Infa
nt Random Dot Stereocards. Eye alignment was assessed by the alternate pris
m and cover or the modified Krimsky test.
RESULTS. Normal infants 2 to 3 months of age exhibited marked nasotemporal
MVEP asymmetry, which rapidly diminished by 6 to 8 months. Neonates did not
exhibit MVEP asymmetry. There was good concordance between fusion and MVEP
symmetry and between stereopsis and MVEP symmetry; the concordance between
MVEP symmetry and orthoposition of the visual axes was significantly poore
r. The same proportion of normal and young esotropic infants showed symmetr
ical MVEPs. Regardless of the age at surgery, most patients with infantile
esotropia had asymmetrical MVEPs after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS. These data support a strong link between fusion and MVEP symme
try during both normal maturation and in infantile esotropia. Furthermore,
the finding that the youngest infants with esotropia do not differ signific
antly from normal suggests that the nasotemporal asymmetry found in older p
atients with infantile esotropia does not represent an arrest of maturation
but, rather, a pathologic change of the motion pathways.