Co-development of VEP motion response and binocular vision in normal infants and infantile esotropes

Citation
Ee. Birch et al., Co-development of VEP motion response and binocular vision in normal infants and infantile esotropes, INV OPHTH V, 41(7), 2000, pp. 1719-1723
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
01460404 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1719 - 1723
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-0404(200006)41:7<1719:COVMRA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
PURPOSE. To determine the maturational course of nasotemporal asymmetry in infantile esotropia and to define the relationships among the symmetry of t he motion visual evoked potential (MVEP), eye alignment, fusion, and stereo psis. METHODS. Sixty healthy term infants and 34 infants with esotropia participa ted. Nasotemporal MVEP asymmetry was assessed by the presence of a signific ant F-1 response component with an interocular phase difference of approxim ately 180 degrees and by an amplitude "asymmetry index." Fusion was evaluat ed using the 4 p.d. base out prism test. Random dot stereoacuity was assess ed in infants with forced-choice preferential looking: (FPL) using the Infa nt Random Dot Stereocards. Eye alignment was assessed by the alternate pris m and cover or the modified Krimsky test. RESULTS. Normal infants 2 to 3 months of age exhibited marked nasotemporal MVEP asymmetry, which rapidly diminished by 6 to 8 months. Neonates did not exhibit MVEP asymmetry. There was good concordance between fusion and MVEP symmetry and between stereopsis and MVEP symmetry; the concordance between MVEP symmetry and orthoposition of the visual axes was significantly poore r. The same proportion of normal and young esotropic infants showed symmetr ical MVEPs. Regardless of the age at surgery, most patients with infantile esotropia had asymmetrical MVEPs after surgery. CONCLUSIONS. These data support a strong link between fusion and MVEP symme try during both normal maturation and in infantile esotropia. Furthermore, the finding that the youngest infants with esotropia do not differ signific antly from normal suggests that the nasotemporal asymmetry found in older p atients with infantile esotropia does not represent an arrest of maturation but, rather, a pathologic change of the motion pathways.