Errors incurred in sampling a cyclostationary field

Citation
Db. Shin et Gr. North, Errors incurred in sampling a cyclostationary field, J ATMOSP OC, 17(5), 2000, pp. 656-664
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
07390572 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
656 - 664
Database
ISI
SICI code
0739-0572(200005)17:5<656:EIISAC>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Low earth-orbiting satellites such as the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Missi on (TRMM) estimate month-long averages of precipitation (or other fields). A difficulty is that such a satellite sensor returns to the same spot on th e planet at discrete intervals, about 11 or 12 h apart. This discrete sampl ing leads to a sampling Error that is the one of the largest components of the error budget. Previous studies have examined this type of error for sta tionary random fields, but this paper examines the possibility that the fie ld has a diurnally varying standard deviation, a property likely to occur i n precipitation fields. This is a special case of the more general cyclosta tionary field. In this paper the authors investigate the mean square error (mse) for the m onthly averaging case derived from the satellites whose revisiting interval s are 12 h (sun synchronous) and off 12 h (11.75 h). In addition, the autho rs take the diurnal cycle of the standard deviation to be a constant plus a single sinusoid, either diurnal or semidiurnal. The authors have derived an mse formula consisting of three parts: the erro rs from the stationary background, the cyclostationary part, and a cross-te rm between them. The separate parts of the mse allow the authors to assess the contribution of the cyclostationary error to the total mse. The results indicate that the cyclostationary errors due to the diurnal var iation appear small for both a 12-h and an off-12-h (11.75 h) revisiting sa tellite. In addition, the cyclostationary error amounts are similar to each other. For the semidiurnally varying field, the cyclostationary errors inc rease rapidly as the magnitude of the variance cycle increases for bath the 12-h and off-12-h revisting satellites. However, the off-12-h sampling sho ws the cyclostationary error to be less than that of the exact 12-h samplin g. Furthermore, the authors have evaluated the cyclostationary error as a func tion of the phase of the satellite visit as it is shifted from the phase of the diurnal cycles (the sun-synchronous case or the start of the month for the off-12-h case). It is found that the cyclostationary error observed fr om the off-12-h satellite is much less sensitive to the phase shift than th e cyclostationary error from the exact 12-h satellite.