Does the Ross operation fulfil the Objective Performance Criteria established for new prosthetic heart valves?

Citation
R. Moidl et al., Does the Ross operation fulfil the Objective Performance Criteria established for new prosthetic heart valves?, J HEART V D, 9(2), 2000, pp. 190-194
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE
ISSN journal
09668519 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
190 - 194
Database
ISI
SICI code
0966-8519(200003)9:2<190:DTROFT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background and aim of the study: Objective Performance Criteria (OPC) were established to compare a new heart valve prosthesis with fixed standards of linearized complication rates for morbid events: thromboembolism, thrombos is, hemorrhage, leakage and endocarditis. Although the pulmonary autograft operation provides optimal hemodynamic performances, the morbidity of both the autograft and homograft remain topics of controversy. Methods: Valve-related morbid events and echocardiography in 109 patients w ho have undergone the Ross operation since 1991 were evaluated at annual fo llow up examination (mean 2.8 years; range: 1 month to 8 years). Linearized rates (number of events per 100 years patient exposure) were calculated to establish the safety and efficacy of this operation (288.7 years cumulativ e patient-years). Results: Three patients died perioperatively (2.8%); two patients were reop erated due to autograft incompetence (1.8%, both valve repairs). No patient is currently on anticoagulation therapy, and no events of thromboembolism, valve thrombosis or bleeding were observed during follow up. Two patients had homograft endocarditis but were asymptomatic with moderate incompetence at the last follow up examination. There was no significant increase in ao rtic incompetence (AI) or pulmonary incompetence (PI) between discharge and follow up (AI, 0.4 +/- 0.5 versus 0.6 +/- 0.6; PI, 0.2 +/- 0.4 versus 0.4 +/- 0.6). In comparing the OPC (events per patient-year) for the Ross opera tion with those for tissue and mechanical valves, the results were: thrombo embolism 0% (tissue 2.5%, mechanical 3%), valve thrombosis 0% (0.2% and 0.8 %), all bleeding 0% (1.4% and 3.5%), major bleeding 0% (0.9% and 1.5%), all leakage 0.7% (1.2% and 1.2%), major leakage 0.7% (1.2% and 1.2%) and endoc arditis 0.7% (1.2% and 1.2%). Conclusion: The pulmonary autograft procedure provides optimal hemodynamics and echocardiographic performance, and low valve-related complication rate s; thus, the OPC for tissue and mechanical heart valve prostheses can be fu lfilled by this technically demanding operation. These results confirm that the autograft is an ideal aortic valve replacement device.