Bi. Shand, Haemorheological effects of losartan and enalapril in patients with renal parenchymal disease and hypertension, J HUM HYPER, 14(5), 2000, pp. 305-309
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of the angiotensin I
I (ang II) antagonist, losartan and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhib
itor (ACEI), enalapril on haemorheology. Twenty-nine patients with renal pa
renchymal disease and hypertension were enrolled in the prospective, open,
parallel study that involved a 14-day washout period followed by a 120-day
treatment period. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either losart
an 50-100 mg/day (n = 15) or enalapril 2.5-10 mg/day (n = 14) to achieve bl
ood pressure control <140/90 mm Hg. Blood pressure, haemorheology profile a
nd plasma fibrinogen concentration were measured after the washout phase an
d after 2, 10, 60, and 120 days of treatment. The data were analysed using
ANOVA with repeated measures. Twenty-seven patients completed the study. Tr
eatment with both losartan and enalapril was associated with a significant
decrease (P < 0.05) in relative high shear rate whole blood viscosity, indi
cating an increase in blood cell deformability. In patients taking losartan
, the increase in blood cell deformability did not result in a decrease in
mean whole blood viscosity due to a concomitant, significant increase in me
an plasma viscosity (P < 0.01). In contrast, the improved cell deformabilit
y in patients treated with enalapril resulted in a small and statistically
insignificant decrease in mean whole blood viscosity (P = 0.06; mean change
= -0.15 mPa sec). The mechanism of the increase in blood cell deformabilit
y and the rise in plasma viscosity associated with losartan remain unclear.
It is possible but unproven that the improvement in intrinsic blood cell r
heology with losartan and enalapril may be the result of changes in cation
transport systems and/or the consequence of the protective antioxidant prop
erties of drug metabolites.