Through a meta-analytic review of the empirical literature on the determina
nts of CEO pay, this study tests the hypothesized relationships between fir
m size, performance, and CEO pay. We show that firm size accounts for more
than 40% of the variance in total CEO pay, while firm performance accounts
for less than 5% of the variance. We also show that pay sensitivities are r
elatively similar for both changes in size (5% of the explained variance in
pay) and changes in financial performance (4% of the explained variance in
pay). The meta-analysis also suggests that moderator variables may play an
important role, but,ve were unable to test for this. (C) 2000 Elsevier Sci
ence Inc. All rights reserved.