Processing and properties of two structurally different poly (ortho esters)
(POE) and their in vitro behavior have been compared. One POE was a copoly
mer of diketene acetal 3,9-diethylidene-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5.5]undecane
, trans-cyclohexanedimethanol and polyacetal. The other POE was a copolymer
of diketene acetal 3,9-diethylidene-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5.5]undecane, t
rans-cyclohexanedimethanol and trans-cyclohexanedimethanol-dilactide. The p
olyacetal POE was also used as a matrix incorporating two different model d
rugs, caffeine and furosemide. Both polymers were ultrasonically molded int
o slabs. The lactide modified POE was also melt-extruded into rods and self
-reinforced using a solid state die-drawing technique. The initial strength
values of both ultrasonically molded and extruded samples were close to th
ose of non-oriented poly lactic acids. Self-reinforcing increased the shear
strength, bending strength and modulus of the rods from 41.7 +/- 1.7MPa to
66.7 +/- 2.3MPa, from 78.5 +/- 22.8MPa to 183 +/- 23MPa and from 2.5 +/- 0
.3GPa to 4.4 +/- 0.3GPa, respectively. In vitro hydrolysis of samples was s
tudied either in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) or in simulated body fluid (
SBF) at 37 degrees C. Samples degraded faster in unchanged PBS than in PBS
changed weekly. The total in vitro strength retention time was relatively s
hort varying from 14 days to 42 days depending on the processing method and
polymer type. Samples retained their wet weight at initial level for a lon
ger time but dry weight started to decrease already after the first in vitr
o week. Polymers or degradation products crystallized in SBF but remained a
morphous when hydrolyzed in PBS. Some of the devices showed evidence of sur
face erosion, and the processing method affected the erosion. The storage t
ime of these polymers was found to be limited. However, both polymers were
found to be of interest in bone fixation and tissue engineering. (C) 2000 K
luwer Academic Publishers.