Comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic hospital privileging program - Implementation and assessment

Citation
Mp. Milad et al., Comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic hospital privileging program - Implementation and assessment, J REPRO MED, 45(5), 2000, pp. 365-370
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00247758 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
365 - 370
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-7758(200005)45:5<365:CGEHPP>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe a comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic privileging p rogram at an urban teaching hospital and evaluate its effect on complicatio n rates. STUDY DESIGN: In 1996, a gynecologic endoscopy privileging program was inst ituted. Initially, experienced surgeons were invited to apply for advanced privileges based on submission of a case list. Afterwards, new applications were approved by proctorship. Since 1995, charts have been reviewed using the following indicators; operating time, estimated blood loss, length of s tay, readmission, diagnosis of cancer, reexploration and admission for hyst eroscopic fluid overload. Cases were also in dependently identified when a major vascular or visceral injury occurred. RESULTS: Among the 3,880 gynecologic endoscopic procedures performed during the review period, 2,702 medical records were randomly screened. Following institution of the program, there was no change noted in rates of hysteros copic fluid overload, readmission, reexploration or unrecognized diagnosis of cancer. However, a decrease runs noted in excess blood loss (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.4, 0.9) and operating time greater than four hours (OR 0.6, CI 0.4, 0.9). Length of hospital stay was also re duced in the year following implementation of the privileging process (OR 0 .2, CI 0.1, 0.3). Fifty-four cases of visceral or major vascular injury occ urred during the three-year period. The risk of visceral injury revealed a trend from 1.9% to 2.0% after institution of the privileging process (OR 0. 5, CI 0.3, 1.0). CONCLUSION: Establishment of a comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic hospita l privileging program runs associated with a reduction in rates of excess b lood loss and operating times and a decreasing trend in visceral injuries.