OBJECTIVE: To describe a comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic privileging p
rogram at an urban teaching hospital and evaluate its effect on complicatio
n rates.
STUDY DESIGN: In 1996, a gynecologic endoscopy privileging program was inst
ituted. Initially, experienced surgeons were invited to apply for advanced
privileges based on submission of a case list. Afterwards, new applications
were approved by proctorship. Since 1995, charts have been reviewed using
the following indicators; operating time, estimated blood loss, length of s
tay, readmission, diagnosis of cancer, reexploration and admission for hyst
eroscopic fluid overload. Cases were also in dependently identified when a
major vascular or visceral injury occurred.
RESULTS: Among the 3,880 gynecologic endoscopic procedures performed during
the review period, 2,702 medical records were randomly screened. Following
institution of the program, there was no change noted in rates of hysteros
copic fluid overload, readmission, reexploration or unrecognized diagnosis
of cancer. However, a decrease runs noted in excess blood loss (odds ratio
[OR] 0.6, 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.4, 0.9) and operating time greater
than four hours (OR 0.6, CI 0.4, 0.9). Length of hospital stay was also re
duced in the year following implementation of the privileging process (OR 0
.2, CI 0.1, 0.3). Fifty-four cases of visceral or major vascular injury occ
urred during the three-year period. The risk of visceral injury revealed a
trend from 1.9% to 2.0% after institution of the privileging process (OR 0.
5, CI 0.3, 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Establishment of a comprehensive gynecologic endoscopic hospita
l privileging program runs associated with a reduction in rates of excess b
lood loss and operating times and a decreasing trend in visceral injuries.