OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the accuracy of clinical and sonographi
c estimates of fetal weight (EFW) in active labor with ruptured membranes.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and sonographic EFWs were obtained on 107 term patie
nts in active labor, with cervical dilatation of 4 cm or more and ruptured
membranes. Accuracy of birth weight ws determined by calculating percentage
error, absolute percentage error and ratio of estimates within 10% of actu
al birth weight for all stages of labor. Statistical analysis was by paired
t test, Wilcoxon sigil test, chi(2) test and Mann-Whitney U test; P<.05 wa
s considered significant.
RESULTS: Absolute percentage errors were lower by the sonographic method at
all stages. Except for the seco)ld stage of labor, the rates of birth weig
ht +/- 10% were higher with the sonographic method than with the clinical m
ethod (83.17% vs. 60.75% and 84.9% vs. 63.44%, respectively). Estimations p
erformed in the first stage were more accurate than in the second stage wit
h both methods (absolute error of 7.82 +/- 5.5 vs. 12.38 +/- 4.9 for clinic
al and 5.44 +/- 5.99 vs. 9.08 +/- 3.19 for sonographic).
CONCLUSION: During active labor with ruptured membranes, sonographic EfWs a
re more accurate than clinical estimations. The accuracy of both methods is
reduced during the second stage of labor.