Ph. Juergensen et al., Tidal peritoneal dialysis: Comparison of different tidal regimens and automated peritoneal dialysis, KIDNEY INT, 57(6), 2000, pp. 2603-2607
Background. The National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initia
tive (DOQI) clinical practice guidelines have suggested minimal weekly Kt/V
urea and creatinine clearance goals for peritoneal dialysis patients maint
ained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated per
itoneal dialysis (APD). Achieving these goals may present problems, particu
larly in larger patients whose residual renal function declines. Thus, modi
fications of the dialysis regimen, such as tidal peritoneal dialysis (TPD),
have been developed. However, the ability of TPD to improve the efficiency
of the dialysis procedure remains uncertain.
Methods. Stable, cycling peritoneal dialysis patients were placed into two
groups to study the effectiveness of different TPD prescriptions on periton
eal clearances of urea and creatinine. The volume of dialysis solution used
and the duration of therapy were fixed in the two groups. Comparisons were
made to conventional APD using multiple hourly cycles in which spent dialy
sis solution was completely drained with each cycle. Group I patients recei
ved a total of 15 L of PD solution over 9.5 hours in the dialysis unit. The
se patients received 10, 25, and 50% TPD and APD on four separate days. Gro
up II patients received 24 L of PD solution over 9.5 hours. These patients
received 25 and 50% APD on separate days in the dialysis unit. Peritoneal d
ialysis clearances for urea (pKt/V) and creatinine (pC(Cr)) levels were cal
culated for both groups. The results were then analyzed to determine whethe
r there was any significant difference among the various prescriptions.
Results. The data in the group I patients indicated a mean daily pKt/V of 0
.22 +/- 0.03 with 10% TPD, 0.23 +/- 0.02 with 25% TPD, 0.25 +/- 0.02 with 5
0% TPD, and 0.26 +/- 0.02 with APD. Paired t-test analysis for pKt/V demons
trated that 10 and 25% TPD resulted in significantly lower values than 50%
TPD and APD (P < 0.05). Mean daily pC(Cr) L/24 h/1.73 m(2) was 6.03 +/- 0.7
2 for 10% TPD, 6.34 +/- 0.83 for 25% TPD, 6.65 +/- 0.51 for 50% TPD, and 7.
01 +/- 0.96 for APD; these differences were not significantly different. Th
e data in the group II patients demonstrated a mean daily pKt/V of 0.28 +/-
0.03 with 25% TPD, 0.29 +/- 0.05 with 50% TPD, and 0.30 +/- 0.05 for APD.
The mean daily pC(Cr) was 6.69 +/- 0.47 for 25% TPD, 8.09 +/- 1.30 for 50%
TPD, and 7.63 +/- 1.13 for APD. There were no statistical differences for p
Kt/V and pC(Cr) within the 24 L group.
Conclusion. When the duration of therapy and volume of dialysate volume are
kept constant, TPD does not result in an improvement in clearances compare
d with conventional APD, at least with dialysate volumes up to 24 L.