Hulless barley as an alternative energy source for growing-finishing pigs on growth performance, carcass quality, and nutrient digestibility

Citation
Jf. Wu et al., Hulless barley as an alternative energy source for growing-finishing pigs on growth performance, carcass quality, and nutrient digestibility, LIVEST PROD, 65(1-2), 2000, pp. 155-160
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE
ISSN journal
03016226 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
155 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-6226(200007)65:1-2<155:HBAAAE>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
One feeding trial and one digestion trial were conducted to compare hulless barley and corn in terms of their effects on pig performance, carcass trai ts, and nutrient digestibility. In the feeding trial, 32 crossbred pigs (Du roc x Landrace X Yorkshire), averaging 22.3 kg each, were randomly assigned to two treatments as follows: (1) a corn-soybean meal control diet, and (2 ) all the corn of the control diet replaced by hulless barley. In the diges tion trial, eight crossbred gilts (Duroc X Landrace X Yorkshire), averaging 65.08 kg, were used to determine the digestibility of the diets. In the fe eding trial, the average daily gain (ADG) of pigs fed the hulless barley di et was significantly higher than that of pigs fed the corn diet during the grower period, but the pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significan tly different in ADG from the pigs fed the corn diet during the finisher an d overall periods. The daily feed intake of pigs fed the hulless barley die t was not significantly different from that of pigs fed the corn diet durin g the grower, finisher, and overall periods. The feed-to-gain ratio of pigs fed the hulless barley diet was not significantly different from that of p igs fed the com diet during the grower period, but the pigs fed the hulless barley diet required less feed per unit of gain than those fed the corn di et during the finisher and overall periods. The dressing percentage, carcas s length, mean backfat thickness, and loin eye area of pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significantly different from those of pigs fed the co rn diet. In the digestion trial, the apparent digestion coefficients of dry matter and energy of pigs fed the hulless barley diet were not significant ly different from those of pigs fed the corn diet. The coefficient for nitr ogen tended to be lower for hulless barley than for corn (P < 0.07). From t hese results, hulless barley is concluded to be a potential alternative ene rgy source for use in swine diets. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All right s reserved.