Stock and Watson (1989) demonstrate that contradictory money-output causali
ty results can be resolved by appealing to the trend properties of money. T
hey find that money growth exhibit a time trend, and detrended money growth
causes output. Imcorporating recent experience suggests that the trend has
vanished, in which case empirical results support the conclusion that mone
y does not cause output. In this paper, we argue that detrended money growt
h is a capable measure of policy but that trend breaks occurred in 1984 and
1991. Using detrended money growth that incorporates trend breaks, we find
that money does indeed cause output.