A principal component analysis based on data for 1113 undergraduates reveal
ed that, as operationalized by the Hemispheric Mode Indicator, cognitive he
mispheric dominance is not a unitary concept. This instrument appealed to e
valuate three discrete cognitive preferences: "prefers structure" vs. "pref
ers flexibility", "fact-oriented" vs. "feeling-oriented," and "verbal" vs.
"visuospatial." Furthermore, some items are negatively correlated with most
others, are ambiguously worded, are excessively complex, or may suffer fro
m response bias. Most importantly, of the three underlying subscales listed
above, only the last is obviously related to an empirically demonstrable a
spect of cognitive cerebral laterality. For these and other reasons, it is
unlikely that the Hemispheric Mode Indicator is a good measure of demonstra
ble hemispheric dominance. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv
ed.