Factor-analytic item analysis of the Hemispheric Mode Indicator

Citation
Se. Hartman et J. Hylton, Factor-analytic item analysis of the Hemispheric Mode Indicator, PERS INDIV, 29(2), 2000, pp. 283-299
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
ISSN journal
01918869 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
283 - 299
Database
ISI
SICI code
0191-8869(200008)29:2<283:FIAOTH>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
A principal component analysis based on data for 1113 undergraduates reveal ed that, as operationalized by the Hemispheric Mode Indicator, cognitive he mispheric dominance is not a unitary concept. This instrument appealed to e valuate three discrete cognitive preferences: "prefers structure" vs. "pref ers flexibility", "fact-oriented" vs. "feeling-oriented," and "verbal" vs. "visuospatial." Furthermore, some items are negatively correlated with most others, are ambiguously worded, are excessively complex, or may suffer fro m response bias. Most importantly, of the three underlying subscales listed above, only the last is obviously related to an empirically demonstrable a spect of cognitive cerebral laterality. For these and other reasons, it is unlikely that the Hemispheric Mode Indicator is a good measure of demonstra ble hemispheric dominance. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv ed.