Purpose - To describe the application of propensity score analysis in pharm
acoepidemiologic research using a study comparing the renal effects of two
commonly prescribed non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Method - Observational data were collected on the change in renal function,
as measured by serum creatinine concentration, before and after use of two
NSAIDs, Ibuprofen and Sulindac. To estimate the treatment effect of the di
fferent NSAIDs, we used the propensity score methodology to reduce the pote
ntial confounding effects caused by unbalanced covariates. After estimating
the propensity scores (the probabilities of each patient being prescribed
Sulindac) from a logistic regression model, we stratified the data based on
sample quintiles of the propensity score distribution. The final estimate
of the treatment effect was then obtained by averaging the treatment estima
tes from the stratified samples.
Results - Initially, 23 covariates differed significantly between the two t
reatment groups. Using the propensity score methodology, we were able to ba
lance the distributions of 16 covariates. The imbalances in the remaining s
even covariates were also greatly reduced. Although the use of either drug
resulted in a decrease in renal function, overall differences between them
were not statistically significant with respect to their effect on creatini
ne concentrations based on the propensity score analysis.
Conclusion - Observational studies often produce treatment groups that are
not directly comparable due to imbalances in covariate distributions betwee
n the treatment groups. Propensity score analysis provides a simple and eff
ective way of controlling the effects of these covariates and obtaining a l
ess biased estimate of the treatment effect. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.