Scholars and journalists have argued that the "game" frame-reporting politi
cs primarily in strategic terms-is predominant in mainstream news reporting
of politics. Game-orientated reporting is problematic, according to it's c
ritics, because it crowds out issue-based reporting. But as of yet we know
little and have theorized little about the specific contexts in which the g
ame frame is likely to be reporters' primary emphasis. While numerous studi
es have documented the predominance of the game schema in election news, th
e empirical record on public policy news is quite limited. Accordingly, the
content of national news about the issue of U.S welfare reform during 1996
is analyzed to illustrate three theoretical propositions about game-framed
news coverage: that the game frame is most likely to be applied to the pub
lic policy issues when they are discussed in national election news, that t
he game frame is also particularly likely to be applied when Washington pol
icy makers are engaged in conflict that promises a clear outcome (i.e., the
passage or rejection of legislation) over key issues in electoral politics
, and that the game frame is less likely to be applied tp public issues whe
n they are discussed in news about state-levels political debates and the i
mplementation phase of policy-making.