Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study, conducted between Ja
nuary 1988 and December 1998 was To demonstrate that physical examination i
s sufficient to manage patients with torsion of the spermatic corn.
Material and Methods: 72 patients, admitted with an empirical diagnosis of
torsion of the spermatic cord based on physical examination, underwent emer
gency surgery via a scrotal incision. Orchidopexy was performed when the su
rgical diagnosis was in favour torsion. We classified our series into 2 gro
ups according to the presence or absence of torsion mid we defined two subg
roups in the torsion group: the orchidectomy subgroup and the non-orchidect
omy subgroup.
Results. The suspicion of torsion of the spermatic cord was confirmed in 70
.8% of cases. No mortality or morbidity Ir ere observed for wrongly operate
d patients. The study of the sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value
(PPV) of clinical signs defined a group of men requiring emergency surgica
l exploration: men presenting with scrotal pain in the absence of any urina
ry signs (Se = 98%, PPV = 72%), negative urinary dip-stick (Se = 97%. PPV=
71 %), with pain described as violent (Se=80%, PPV=76%), an ascended testis
(Se=62%, PPV=86%) and a subacute stage (Se=68%, PPV=79%). The only pejorat
ive factor detected in the presence of testicular necrosis uns a delay befo
re management greater than 6 hours. The length of hospital stay (p<0.041) a
nd the complication rate (p<0.023) were greater in the orchidectomy subgrou
p compared to the non-orchidectomy subgroup.
Conclusion: This retrospective study confirms that physical examination is
sufficient to ensure good management of torsion of the spermatic cord bz ad
ults and that emergency surgical exploration is justified at the slightest
doubt.