Np. Hurst et al., Does waiting matter? A randomized controlled trial of new non-urgent rheumatology out-patient referrals, RHEUMATOLOG, 39(4), 2000, pp. 369-376
Objective. To examine the effect of waiting times on the health status of p
atients referred For a non-urgent rheumatology opinion.
Methods. The study was a randomized controlled clinical study evaluating a
'fast track' appointment with a 6-week target waiting time against an 'ordi
nary' appointment in the main city out-patient clinic of the rheumatology s
ervice for the Lothian and Borders region (population similar to 1 million)
. Health status was measured using the SF12 physical and mental summary com
ponent T-scores and pain was measured with a 100 mm visual analogue pain sc
ale. Secondary outcomes were health utility and perceived health both measu
red with the EuroQol instrument, mental health measured with the Hospital A
nxiety and Depression scale, disability with the modified Health Assessment
Questionnaire and economic costs measured from a societal perspective.
Results. Mean waiting times were 43 days (sigma = +/-16) and 105 days (sigm
a = +/-51) for 'fast track' and 'ordinary' appointments, respectively. Both
groups showed significant improvements in mean [95% confidence interval (C
I)] scores for pain: 11 (7, 16)(P < 0.001); physical health status: 4 (2, 5
) (P < 0.001); mental health status: 2 (0.1, 4) (P < 0.02); and health util
ity: 0.11 (0.07, 0.16) (P < 0.001) by the end of the 15-month period of the
study, but there was no significant difference between either arm of the s
tudy.
Conclusions. Rationing by delay was not detrimental to either mental or phy
sical health and patients in both arms of the study showed significant and
similar improvement in health by 15 months. Expenditure of resources on wai
ting times without regard to clinical outcomes is likely to be wasteful and
additional resources should be directed at achieving the greatest clinical
benefit. More research into effective methods of controlling demand and be
tter identification of those who would benefit from access to specialist ca
re is needed.