K. Jordan et al., The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement systemin measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects, RHEUMATOLOG, 39(4), 2000, pp. 382-388
Objectives. To assess the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of
a new three-dimensional measurement system, the FASTRAK, in measuring cervi
cal spine flexion/ extension. lateral flexion and rotation and shoulder fle
xion/extension, abduction and external rotation in healthy subjects.
Methods. The study was conducted in two parts. One part assessed inter-obse
rver reliability with two observers measuring 40 subjects. The other part a
ssessed intra-observer reliability with one observer measuring 32 subjects
on three occasions. All subjects had unrestricted, pain-free cervical spine
and shoulder movement. Reliability was measured by the intraclass correlat
ion coefficient [ICC(2,1)].
Results. The inter-observer ICCs for the cervical spine ranged from 0.61 to
0.89 and for the shoulder from 0.68 to 0.75. After removal of outliers, al
l ICCs were above 0.70. Intraobserver ICCs for the cervical spine ranged fr
om 0.54 to 0.82 and for the shoulder from 0.62 to 0.81. After removal of ou
tliers, all ICCs were above 0.70 except for shoulder abduction (0.62).
Conclusions. Whilst all movements measured by the FASTRAK showed good relia
bility, the reliability of the whole movement in a plane (e.g. left plus ri
ght lateral flexion) was better than for the separate movements (e.g. left
and right lateral flexion taken separately). Interobserver reliability was
generally better than intra-observer reliability for most cervical spine mo
vements, suggesting that variability of movement within subjects (e.g. over
a period of days) for these movements was greater than variability between
measures on the same occasion.