Effects of smoking, alcohol and APOE genotype on Alzheimer disease: The MIRAGE study

Citation
La. Cupples et al., Effects of smoking, alcohol and APOE genotype on Alzheimer disease: The MIRAGE study, ALZHEIM REP, 3(2), 2000, pp. 105-114
Citations number
67
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
ALZHEIMERS REPORTS
ISSN journal
14616130 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
105 - 114
Database
ISI
SICI code
1461-6130(200003/04)3:2<105:EOSAAA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
To determine the influence of smoking and alcohol consumption on risk of Al zheimer disease (AD), 238 AD patients enrolled in the MIRAGE Study at three centers in the Boston, Massachusetts area were each frequency matched on t he basis of sex, age, and year of birth to three non-demented control subje cts from the Framingham Study, a longitudinal study of health in a communit y 20 miles from Boston. Regular consumers of alcohol, including those drink ing above and below the USDA recommended limits of 1.0 drinks/day for women and 2.0 drinks/day for men, had a significantly lower risk of AD compared to non-drinkers (crude OR's of 0.67 for consumers within the recommended gu idelines and 0.48 for alcohol consumption above). Ever-smokers were less li kely to develop AD than non-smokers, but this difference was not significan t. Analyses evaluating the joint effects of drinking and smoking and adjust ing for education and APOE epsilon 4 status eliminated the effect of smokin g but did not lessen the effect of alcohol consumption. However, among epsi lon 4 carrier women, smokers had a higher risk of AD than non-smokers where as smoking was somewhat protective among women lacking epsilon 4. Although these trends were not significant, the interaction between smoking and epsi lon 4 status was significant (p=0.02). Smoking did not influence AD risk in men regardless of APOE genotype. The interaction between smoking, gender a nd APOE may help explain previous contradictory findings about the effect o f smoking on AD risk. Alcohol consumption within nationally recommended lim its may protect against AD. However, it would be premature to recommend thi s as a prophylaxis until the protective mechanism is understood and further studies are performed to more precisely define the minimal level and durat ion of exposure necessary to realize a benefit.