Background The prediction and comparison of procedural death oiler percutan
eous coronary interventional procedures is inherently difficult because of
variations in case mix and practice patterns. The impact of modern, expande
d patient selection criteria, and newer technologic approaches is unknown.
Our objective was to determine whether a risk equation bored on patient-rel
ated variables and derived from an independent data set can accurately pred
ict procedural death after percutaneous coronary intervention in the curren
t era.
Methods and Results An analysis was made of the Mayo Clinic Coronary Interv
entional Database January 1, 1995, to October 31, 1997. Expected mortality
rate was calculated with the use of the New York State multivariate risk sc
ore. In 3387 patients. 3830 procedures (55.1% stents) were performed, with
an expected mortality rate ai 2.32% and observed mortality rate of 2.38% (P
= not significant). The risk score derived from the New York multivariate
model was highly predictive of death (chi-square = 213.8; P < .0001). The p
resence of a high-risk lesion characteristic such as calcium, thrombus, or
type C lesion was modestly associated with death.
Conclusions The New York State multivariate model accurately predicted proc
edural death in our database.