Fe. Thompson et al., Evaluation of 2 brief instruments and a food-frequency questionnaire to estimate daily number of servings of fruit and vegetables, AM J CLIN N, 71(6), 2000, pp. 1503-1510
Background: Measurement of fruit and vegetable intake is important in the s
urveillance of populations and in epidemiologic studies that examine the re
lations between diet and disease. Some situations require the use of brief
dietary assessment tools.
Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the performance of 2 brief dietary
assessment instruments, a 7-item standard screener and a new 16-item scree
ner, and a complete food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in measuring total f
ruit and vegetable consumption.
Design: About 800 men and women from the National Institutes of Health-AARP
Diet and Health Study completed an FFQ, 1 of the 2 screeners, and two 24-h
dietary recalls. Fruit and vegetable intakes as measured by each screener
and the FFQ were compared with estimated true usual intake by using a measu
rement-error model.
Results: Median daily servings of fruit and vegetables were underestimated
by both screeners. The estimated agreement between true intake and the scre
ener was higher for the new screener than for the standard screener and was
higher for women than for men. The estimated agreement between true intake
and the FFQ was higher than that for both screeners. Attenuation coefficie
nts for the FFQ and screeners were comparable.
Conclusions: For estimating median intakes of fruit and vegetables and the
prevalence of recommended intakes being met, the use of screeners without a
ppropriate adjustment is suboptimal. For estimating relative risks in the r
elations between fruit and vegetable intake and disease, screeners and this
FFQ are similar in performance.