Do cytokeratin-positive-only sentinel lymph nodes warrant complete axillary lymph node dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer?

Citation
Ms. Teng et al., Do cytokeratin-positive-only sentinel lymph nodes warrant complete axillary lymph node dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer?, AM SURG, 66(6), 2000, pp. 574-578
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
AMERICAN SURGEON
ISSN journal
00031348 → ACNP
Volume
66
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
574 - 578
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1348(200006)66:6<574:DCSLNW>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
The small number of nodes harvested with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lym ph node (SLN) biopsy has allowed a more detailed pathologic examination of those nodes. Immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin (CK-IHC) have been used in an attempt to minimize the false negative rate for SLN mapping. Thi s study examines the value of CK-IHC positivity in predicting further lymph node involvement in the axillary basin. From April 1998 through May 1999, 519 lymphatic mappings and SLN biopsies were performed for invasive breast cancer. SLNs were examined by imprint cytology, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) , and CK-IHC. patients with evidence of metastatic disease by any of the ab ove techniques were eligible for complete axillary node dissection (CAND). The frequency with which these modalities predicted further lymph node invo lvement in the axillary basin was compared. Of the 519 lymphatic mappings, 39 patients (7.5%) had a CK-IHC-positive-only SLN. Five (12.8%) of these 39 patients had at least 2 SLNs positive by CK-IHC. Twenty-six of the CK-IHC- positive-only patients underwent CAND. Three of these 26 patients (11.5%) h ad additional metastases identified after CAND. The sensitivity levels with which each modality detected further axillary lymph node involvement were as follows: CK-IHC, 98 per cent; H&E, 94 per cent; and imprint cytology, 87 per cent. A logistic regression to compare the prognostic value of the thr ee modalities was performed. All were significant, with odds ratios of 19.1 for CK-IHC (P = 0.015), 5.3 for H&E (P = 0.033), and 3.86 for imprint cyto logy (P = 0.0059). These data validate the enhanced detection of CK-IHC for the evaluation of SLNs. Detection of CK-IHC-positive SLNs appears to warra nt CAND in patients with invasive breast cancer. However, the therapeutic v alue of CAND or adjuvant therapies based on CK-IHC-positive SLNs would be b est answered by prospective randomized trials.