The impact of allowing witnesses to choose the type of cues presented in mu
ltimedia mug books was explored in two experiments. In Experiment 1, partic
ipants viewed a videotaped crime and attempted to identify the perpetrator
from one of three types of mug books: (a) dynamic-combined - participants c
ould choose to follow static mug shots with a computerized video clip combi
ning three types of dynamic cues: the person walking, talking, and rotating
; (b) dynamic-separable - participants could limit the types of dynamic cue
s presented; and (c) static-just the static mug shot was presented. The dyn
amic-separable condition produced significantly fewer false positive foil i
dentifications than the static condition. Within the dynamic-separable cond
ition, voice was the most preferred cue. Experiment 2 explored the contribu
tion of the individual cues. Participants attempted identifications from si
ngle dynamic cue mug books where only one type of cue was presented if a pa
rticipant chose additional information. It was found that providing individ
ual cues did not improve performance over the static mug book control. Base
d on the potential danger of witnesses choosing to rely on single dynamic c
ues, it was suggested that multimedia mug books should present dynamic cues
in combination. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.