We consider the back-reaction of the magnetic held on the magnetic dynamo c
oefficients and the role of boundary conditions in interpreting whether num
erical evidence for suppression is dynamical. If a uniform held in a period
ic box serves as the initial condition for modeling the back-reaction on th
e turbulent EMF, then the magnitude of the turbulent EMF, and thus the dyna
mo coefficient a, have a stringent upper limit that depends on the magnetic
Reynolds number R-M to a power of order -1. This is not a dynamic suppress
ion but results just because of the imposed boundary conditions. In contras
t, when mean held gradients are allowed within the simulation region, or no
nperiodic boundary conditions are used, the upper limit is independent of R
-M and takes its kinematic value. Thus only for simulations of the latter t
ypes could a measured suppression be the result of a dynamic back-reaction.
This is fundamental for understanding a long-standing controversy surround
ing a suppression. Numerical simulations that do not allow any field gradie
nts and invoke periodic boundary conditions appear to show a strong a suppr
ession (e.g., Cattaneo & Hughes). Simulations of accretion disks that allow
field gradients and allow free boundary conditions (Brandenburg & Donner)
suggest a dynamo a that is not suppressed by a power of R-M Our results are
consistent with both types of simulations.