P. Kjellstrand et al., Toxicity testing of polymer materials for dialysis equipment: Reconsidering in vivo testing, ATLA-ALT L, 28(3), 2000, pp. 495-502
The rationale for preclinical testing of plastic materials for medical devi
ces is the protection of patients from leachable toxic substances. A contro
versial and costly part of this testing is the use of animal in vivo proced
ures. The objective of the present study was to analyse the importance of i
n vivo tests in relation to the decision to approve or not to approve mater
ials for use. A total of 1044 plastic materials were analysed by employing
chemical, in vitro and in vivo tests: 5708 in vivo tests were performed. In
only one out of 2650 systemic injection tests on mice did a material fail.
As that material also failed in chemical tests, the systemic injection tes
t had no influence on the decision not to approve the material. Intradermal
irritation (2644 tests), implantation (398 tests) and sensitivity (11 test
s) procedures on rabbits and guinea-pigs were the other in vivo tests. Howe
ver, in ail except three cases, the same decision on whether or not to use
a material would have been reached without any of these in vivo tests. Thus
, little security appears to be gained from the in vivo tests, and abandoni
ng them would save resources, probably without any additional risk.