A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to assess what publish
ed evidence is currently available to support the increasing use of autolog
ous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and to evaluate the published data wi
th regard to the comparative cost, of high-dose and conventional therapy. T
he review aimed to identify all published, randomized controlled trials (RC
Ts) comparing high-dose therapy (HDT) with ASCT versus conventional chemoth
erapy (CC) in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgki
n's disease, multiple myeloma, and breast, lung, testicular and ovarian can
cer. The review also aimed to identify all studies that had compared the co
st of the two treatment strategies, Reports were identified by systematic s
earches of Cancerlit, Embase and Medline, and handsearching of several conf
erence proceedings. Where possible, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculate
d according to the fixed-effect model. A total of 18 randomized trials were
identified in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgk
in's disease, multiple myeloma, and breast, lung and testicular cancer. Tri
als were generally small and no disease site had sufficient information to
determine reliably whether high-dose therapy with autologous transplant is
more effective than CC. Five studies were identified that compared the cost
of the two treatments. These found the cost of HDT to be between one and f
our times higher than that of CC. Further randomized trials are required. W
here appropriate, these should include economic assessment and assessments
of long-term toxicity.