A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate the potential of two cactu
s species, Echinopsis chilensis and Eulychnia acida, to evolve defensive tr
aits against the parasitic mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus (Loranthaceae). The
adaptive value of host traits against parasitism was inferred through: (1)
identification of the relevant characters of cacti to prevent infection, (
2) evaluation of the fitness impact of parasitism on cacti, and (3) estimat
ion of the linear and nonlinear selection coefficients on the relevant char
acters. Different lines of experimental and correlative evidence indicated
that spine length was important in preventing individuals of the two cactus
species from becoming parasitized. However, the impact of the mistletoe on
cactus fecundity was contingent on the species involved. Even though paras
itism decreased fruit production, seed number per fruit, and the total seed
output in E. chilensis, low and nonsignificant linear and nonlinear gradie
nts of selection were prevalent in this species, indicating absence of dire
ctional and stabilizing/disruptive selection for spine length. Additional a
nalysis based on logistic regression, however, revealed that long-spined E.
chilensis had a higher probability of reproduction than did short-spined i
ndividuals. Unlike its effect on E, chilensis, the mistletoe had no fitness
impact on E. acida, and the maintenance and evolution of spines in this sp
ecies could not be attributed to parasite-mediated selection. Even though s
pines act as a first line of defense against parasitism in the two cactus s
pecies, selection was detected only on E. chilensis. These results indicate
that inferences on the adaptive value of host traits based only upon their
role in preventing infection run the risk of overestimating parasite-media
ted selection, and thus the potential for host-parasite coevolution.