Phenological weighting of ozone exposures in the calculation of critical levels for wheat, bean and plantain

Citation
G. Soja et al., Phenological weighting of ozone exposures in the calculation of critical levels for wheat, bean and plantain, ENVIR POLLU, 109(3), 2000, pp. 517-524
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
ISSN journal
02697491 → ACNP
Volume
109
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
517 - 524
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-7491(2000)109:3<517:PWOOEI>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
This paper presents phenological weighting factors to be applied to AOT40 ( accumulated ozone exposure above a threshold of 40 nl l(-1)) ozone exposure -response relationships for crops at different growth stages. The quantific ation of such factors represents a step-forward in the derivation of Level II critical levels for ozone. The weighting factors presented are derived f rom published literature on the sensitivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum), b ean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and plantain (Plantago major) to ozone at differen t growth stages. Weighting functions were calculated using either multiple linear regression or the reciprocal residual mean square (RMS-1). The resul ting weights were transformed into multiplication factors to be applied to the monthly AOT40 during the 3-month assessment period of critical level ex ceedance. Interspecific differences were too large to allow for the develop ment of a unified weighting function for the three species considered. For wheat grain yield, the derived multiplication factors varied by almost four -fold (0.40, 1.06, 1.54), while those for bean pod yield varied by only abo ut 25% (0.85, 1.01, 1.14), The available data for plantain were restricted to short-term studies conducted under controlled conditions. These data wer e not suitable for the derivation of weighting factors comparable to those derived for bean and wheat. Based on known differences in wheat development and phenology across Europe, the need for a geographic differentiation of the time period for the calculation of the critical level exceedances is al so discussed and examples provided of the adoption of the derived weighting s in the mapping of critical level exceedances. Differences between critica l level exceedance maps using weighted and unweighted AOT40 calculations ar e discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.