In Sweden laparoscopic antireflux surgery started in 1991, and within four
years replaced the open procedure as the method of choice. It is, however,
not yet settled which of the two techniques is most cost effective. To comp
are these two operations in economic terms we studied all reports up to Sep
tember 1997 as well as the register in the epidemiological unit of the Nati
onal Board of Health and Welfare (EpC). We found numerous reports on consec
utive series of laparoscopic procedures, several non-randomised studies, an
d only one randomised prospective study comparing open and laparoscopic ant
ireflux surgery. The few studies about the economics of antireflux surgery
indicated that hospital costs were equal or less for the laparoscopic proce
dure. If one adds the costs from loss of production (sick leave) it will be
an even more favourable outcome for the laparoscopic treatment.
The figures from EpC showed that antireflux surgery is done infrequently in
many surgical departments. This may have a substantial influence on the ec
onomic outcome as well as the effectiveness of antireflux surgery in Sweden
. Few studies have compared open and laparoscopic methods from an economic
perspective. As a tool for cost benefit analysis these reports are incomple
te.