The rejection of Cartesian dualism can be taken to imply that the mind is i
mplicated in health and illness to a greater degree than conventional medic
ine would suggest. Surprisingly, however, there appears to be a train of th
ought in antidualist nursing theory which takes the opposite view. This pap
er looks closely at an interesting example of antidualist thinking - an art
icle in which Benner and her colleagues comment on the ways in which people
with asthma make sense of their condition - and concludes that it places u
nduly stringent and arbitrary limits on the mind's role. It then asks how a
ntidualism can lead to such a dogmatic rejection of the idea that states of
the body are clinically influenced by states of mind. The answer to this q
uestion is that Benner assimilates very different philosophical theories in
to the same 'tradition'. On this occasion, she has combined Descartes, Kant
and the Platonist ascetics into a single package, misleadingly labelled 'C
artesianism', and this move accounts for her unexpected views on the relati
on between mind and body in asthma.