Qualitative data analysis is a complex and contested part of the research p
rocess that has received limited theoretical attention. This paper explores
the relationship between the way in which data are analysed and the nature
of findings that emerge. It does this in response to demands to recognize
the multiple voices that inform representations of reality, and debates abo
ut whether the interpretation of data reveals or constructs meaning. A smal
l segment of data provided by one informant is subjected to both thematic a
nd narrative analysis and the different perspectives that emerge are discus
sed with reference to whether different kinds of analysis lead to different
kinds of meaning being imputed to the same text. The paper suggests that,
rather than provide a unified and ever-more refined version of 'reality', t
he use of dual or multiple analysis helps to elucidate alternative interpre
tations of the data which might escape consideration with the use of a sing
le approach.