Evaluation of IS200-PCR and comparison with other molecular markers to trace Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serotype typhimurium bovine isolates from farm to meat

Citation
Y. Millemann et al., Evaluation of IS200-PCR and comparison with other molecular markers to trace Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serotype typhimurium bovine isolates from farm to meat, J CLIN MICR, 38(6), 2000, pp. 2204-2209
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2204 - 2209
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200006)38:6<2204:EOIACW>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
A procedure that uses an original molecular marker (IS200-PCR) and that is based on the amplification of DNA with outward-facing primers complementary to each end of IS200 has been evaluated with a collection of 85 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates. These strains were isolated from a group of 10 cows at different stages: during transportatio n between the farm and the slaughterhouse, on the slaughter line, from the environment, and from the final product (ground beef). The 85 isolates were characterized by their antibiotic resistance patterns and were compared by IS200-PCR and by use of four other genotypic markers. Those markers includ ed restriction profiles for 16S and 23S rRNA (ribotypes) and amplification profiles obtained by different approaches: random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR, and PCR rib otyping. The results of the IS200-PCR were in accordance with those of othe r molecular typing methods for this collection of isolates. Five different genotypes were found, which made it possible to refine the hypotheses on tr ansmission obtained from phenotypic results, The genotyping results indicat ed the massive contamination of the whole group of animals and of the envir onment by one clonal strain originally recovered from one cow that excreted the strain. On the other hand, a few animals and their environment appeare d to be simultaneously contaminated with genetically different strains.