Viral infections in free-living populations of the European wildcat

Citation
Cm. Leutenegger et al., Viral infections in free-living populations of the European wildcat, J WILDL DIS, 35(4), 1999, pp. 678-686
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
ISSN journal
00903558 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
678 - 686
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3558(199910)35:4<678:VIIFPO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
While the importance of viral infections is well studied in domestic cats, only limited information is available on their occurence and prevalence in the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris). The aim of this study w as to determine the prevalence of antibodies to feline coronavirus (FCoV), calicivirus (FCV), herpesvirus (FHV), parovirus (FPV), immunodeficiency vir us (FIV), leukemia virus (FeLV), and FeLV antigenemia in 51 European wildca t sera, Samples were collected between 1996 and 1997 from wildcat populatio ns in France, Switzerland, and Germany Antibodies to FCoV were detected in two cats (4%) and FCoV RNA was detected in feces of one of these two cats. Antibodies to FCV, FHV and FPV were found at relatively low frequencies of 16%, 4%, and 2%, respectively. Antibodies to FIV were not detected. Althoug h;antigen and antibodies to FeLV were detected in 49%, and 75%, respectivel y no evidence of FeLV-associated pathology was found. From the low prevalen ce of FCoV, FCV, FHV and FPV infections and from the fact that the European wildcats live solitarily, it was concluded that these viral infections do not spread readily within a population. Therefore, it may be assumed that r elease into the wild of European wildcats bred in captivity would not bring about a high risk of introducing of these viral infections to the free-ran ging wildcats. As an exception, wildcats should be tested for absence of FI V infection before release if they were at risk to acquire this infection f rom domestic cats.