Human papillomavirus testing in women with mild cytologic atypia

Citation
C. Bergeron et al., Human papillomavirus testing in women with mild cytologic atypia, OBSTET GYN, 95(6), 2000, pp. 821-827
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00297844 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Part
1
Pages
821 - 827
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(200006)95:6<821:HPTIWW>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by Hybrid Capture II (Digene Diagnostics Inc., Silver Spring, MD) with reg ard to detecting biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or high-grade CIN in women with mild atypia, compared with the efficiencies of polymerase chain reaction (FCR), Southern blot hybridization, and cytol ogy. Methods: We prospectively studied 378 women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (n = 111) or low-grade squamous intraepi thelial lesions (SILs) (n = 267) demonstrated by referral cytology. We did repeat cytology, sampling for detection of HPV DNA by Hybrid Capture II, PC R, and Southern blot hybridization, and colposcopic evaluation with cervica l biopsies. Results: All participants underwent the Hybrid Capture II test and 320 unde rwent the three HPV tests. Sensitivities of Hybrid Capture II for detecting CIN and high-grade CIN (0.81 and 0.86, respectively) were similar to those of cytology (0.83 and 0.82, respectively) and PCR (0.77 and 0.95, respecti vely), and higher than those of Southern blot hybridization (0.48 and 0.45, respectively). Compared with cytology, combined triage with Hybrid Capture II improved sensitivities for detecting CIN (0.94 versus 0.83, P < .001) a nd high-grade CIN (0.96 versus 0.85), though the latter difference was not significant (P = .17). In women with ASCUS, sensitivities of combined triag e and cytology for detecting CIN were 0.94 and 0.71, respectively (P = .01) , and sensitivities of the two methods for detecting high-grade CIN were 0. 92 and 0.66, respectively (P = .13). The increase in sensitivity was lower among women with low-grade SILs; for these women, cytology had high sensiti vity (0.86 for CIN and 1.00 for high-grade GIN). The specificity of combine d triage was significantly lower than that of: cytology in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with repeat cytology, combined triage with HPV testing markedly improves sensitivity for detecting CIN in women with ASCUS, but a t the expense of specificity. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:821-7. (C) 2000 by Th e American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).