Effect of neonatal test environment on recording transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Citation
Gm. Headley et al., Effect of neonatal test environment on recording transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions, PEDIATRICS, 105(6), 2000, pp. 1279-1285
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
105
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1279 - 1285
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(200006)105:6<1279:EONTEO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective. To examine the effect of test environment on recording transient -evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in neonates. Methods. Thirty-two infants from the newborn nursery (NBN) who passed a scr eening auditory brainstem response (SABR) test and were at least 34 weeks' postconceptional age were studied. One ear of each newborn was tested using TEOAE in 5 different test environments: open bassinet in the NBN (E1), wor king isolet located in the NBN (E2), nonfunctioning isolet in the NBN (E3), nonfunctioning isolet in a quiet room off the NBN (E4), and open bassinet in a quiet room (E5). The number of high noise samples (HNS), the test dura tion (in seconds), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; in dB) measured at bandw idths centered at 1.6, 2.4, 3.2, and 4.0 kHz, and the percentage of neonate s with a fail screening outcome based on a common pass-fail screening crite ria were compared in the 5 test environments. Results. There were statistically significant differences in the number of HNS accumulated in the 5 test environments (F = 6.79). The use of a nonfunc tioning isolet in both the NBN and within a room off the NBN (E3 and E4, re spectively) resulted in significantly fewer HNS than when TEOAEs were recor ded in the other 3 test environments (E1, E2, and E5). Mean test duration w as significantly different among the 5 locations (F 5 6.53). Posthoc analys es revealed that test time in E3 and E4 was significantly shorter than in E 1 and E2. The percentage of newborns with a fail (less than or equal to 3 d B SNR at 2.4, 3.2, and 4.0 kHz) outcome was lowest in E3 (6.3%) and the sam e in E1 and E4 (12.5%). A high percentage of infants received a fail outcom e when tested in both the working isolet and in the open bassinet in a room off the nursery (21.8% and 25%, respectively). SNR (in dB) for bandwidths centered at 1.6, 2.4, and 3.2 kHz was negatively correlated with the HNS in the working isolet. SNR (in dB) at 4.0 kHz was negatively correlated with the HNS when TEOAEs were recorded in the open bassinet in a room adjacent t o the NBN. The number of HNS was correlated with overall test time in each environment. Conclusions. Test environments typically used for newborn hearing screening can influence the recording of TEOAEs. Performing the TEOAE test with the neonate placed in a nonfunctioning isolet located in either the NBN or in a room off of the NBN resulted in the most desirable outcomes (shortest test times, fewest HNS, highest SNR (in dB), and fewest fail outcomes).