Permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital: indications,patient characteristics, and complications

Citation
A. Eltrafi et al., Permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital: indications,patient characteristics, and complications, POSTG MED J, 76(896), 2000, pp. 337-339
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00325473 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
896
Year of publication
2000
Pages
337 - 339
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-5473(200006)76:896<337:PPIIAD>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
This report reviews the experience of permanent pacemaker insertion in a di strict general hospital (catchment population of 350 000) and makes a compa rison with the national database and other hospitals in the UK. Methods-The records of all patients receiving a permanent pacemaker in the inclusive period January 1996 to December 1998 were reviewed. Data collecte d included number of patients paced each year, age, sex, indications, and c omplications. Results-In the three years reviewed 200 patients received new permanent pac emakers, a rate of 190 per million population per year, which is similar to the national implantation rate of permanent pacemakers but lower than that of most European countries (see discussion). The majority of patients pace d were elderly (75% were above the age of 70 years). Atrioventricular block (including complete heart block, 45%, and Mobitz typ e 2 block, 12.5%) was the commonest indication for permanent pacemaker inse rtion, followed by sick sinus syndrome (25%) and these findings are compara ble to those reported previously. However, carotid sinus syndrome was respo nsible for 16% of the patients paced and this was higher than that reported in the national database (6.5%). Only 1% of the pacemaker modes used was i nappropriate and the complication rate was low at 3%. Conclusions-This report confirms that permanent pacemaker insertion can be effectively and safely provided locally for the increasingly ageing populat ion. The implantation rate both locally and nationally is still much lower than that of some countries in Europe.