Comparison of Pulmicort (R) pMDI plus Nebuhaler (R) and Pulmicort (R) Turbuhaler (R) in asthmatic patients with dysphonia

Citation
Gk. Crompton et al., Comparison of Pulmicort (R) pMDI plus Nebuhaler (R) and Pulmicort (R) Turbuhaler (R) in asthmatic patients with dysphonia, RESP MED, 94(5), 2000, pp. 448-453
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546111 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
448 - 453
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(200005)94:5<448:COP(PP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background. Dysphonia is a known local adverse effect of inhaled corticoste roids. This symptom was investigated by laryngoscopy and assessment in a vo ice laboratory. The effects of changing the treatment of patients with dysp honia, reported whilst using the pMDI, to pMDI plus Nebuhaler(R) or Tubuhal er(R) was also assessed. Methods. Seventy-two patients reporting dysphonia and taking inhaled steroi ds from a pMDI entered a 12-week, open, parallel group study. Fifty-one com pleted the study per protocol; 26 in the Nebuhaler group [21 female, mean a ge 57 years (22-77)] and 25 in the Turbuhaler(R) group [18 female, mean age 58 years (11-81)]. A dysphonia diary card was completed weekly. Voice labo ratory assessments and laryngoscopy were performed on entry and at 12 weeks . Results. There were no differences in voice laboratory data, laryngoscopic evidence of disordered glottic closure and diary data between the two group s at 12 weeks. At study entry laryngoscopic appearances were normal in almo st half the patients. Vocal cord bowing was rarely seen. Glottic closure ch anged in nine patients during the study period, but there was no correlatio n with voice symptoms. The trend of symptomatic improvement of voice status in the Turbuhaler(R) group did not correlate with voice laboratory assessm ents and laryngoscopic evidence of disordered glottic closure. After 4 weeks, 40% of patients using Turbuhaler(R) and 8% in the Nebuhaler( R) group scored their voice status as better (P < 0.02) but there was no si gnificant difference between the two groups at 12 weeks (Turbuhaler(R) 52%, Nebuhaler(R) 23%, P = 0.08). Conclusion. This study does not support the view that dysphonia in asthmati cs inhaling corticosteroids is usually caused by myopathic bowing of the vo cal cord muscles.