Inefficient inhaler technique is a common problem resulting in poor drug de
livery, decreased disease control and increased inhaler use. The aim of thi
s study was to assess patients' use of different inhaler devices and to asc
ertain whether patient preference is indicative of ease of use and whether
current inhaler use has any influence on either technique or preference. We
also wished to define the most appropriate method of selecting an inhaler
for a patient, taking into account observed technique and device cost. One
hundred patients received instruction, in randomized order, in the use of s
even different inhaler devices. After instruction they were graded (using p
redetermined criteria) in their inhaler technique. After assessment patient
s were asked which three inhalers they most preferred and which, if any, th
ey currently used. Technique was best using the breath-actuated inhalers; t
he Easi-Breathe(R) and Autohaler(R), with 91% seen to have good technique.
The pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) Fared poorly, in last position
with only 79% of patients showing good technique, despite being the most co
mmonly prescribed. The Easi-Breathe(R) was by far the most popular device w
ith the patients. The Autohaler(R) came in second position closely followed
by the Clickhaler(R) and Accuhaler(R). The majority of patients (55%) curr
ently used the pMDI but the pMDI did not score highly for preference or ach
ieve better grades than the other devices. Only 79% of patients tested coul
d use the pMDI effectively even after expert instruction yet it continues t
o be commonly prescribed. This has important repercussions for drug deliver
y and hence disease control. Prescribing a patient's preferred device incre
ases cost but can improve efficiency and therefore be cost effective in the
long term. Using an inexpensive device (pMDI) when technique is good and t
he patient's preferred inhaler device when not is one way to optimize deliv
ery and may even reduce cost.