Anti-SSA/Ro antibody determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay asa supplement to standard immunofluorescence in antinuclear antibody screening
S. Blomberg et al., Anti-SSA/Ro antibody determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay asa supplement to standard immunofluorescence in antinuclear antibody screening, SC J IMMUN, 51(6), 2000, pp. 612-617
The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and possible clinica
l relevance of SSA/Ro antibodies, as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorb
ent assay (ELISA), in patient sera not exhibiting a concomitant positive re
action by the standard immunofluorescence (IF) test using HEP-2 cells as su
bstrate. SSA/Ro reactivity, as shown by ELISA, was found in 285 (7%) of 402
5 serum samples consecutively remitted for antinuclear antibody (ANA) scree
ning. Seventy-five of these serum samples (26%), derived from 64 patients,
were negative by the IF-ANA screening test. Serum samples from all 64 patie
nts exhibiting SSA/Ro reactivity by ELISA without concomitant positivity by
IF-ANA were further investigated by IF using transfected HEP-2 cells hyper
expressing the 60,000 MW SSA/Ro antigen (HEP-2000(R)) and by immunodiffusio
n (ID) and Western blot. In 55 of these 64 patients, SSA/Ro reactivity coul
d be verified by one or more of the other techniques investigated. Twelve o
f these patients fulfilled four or more American College of Rheumatology (A
CR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and another five patien
ts exhibited a histologically confirmed cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE).
In four of the 12 IF-ANA-negative patients with a diagnosis of SLE, the SS
A/Ro reactivity was only detectable by ELISA and Western blot. In conclusio
n, the use of a sensitive ELISA assay could provide a clinically important
supplement to the routine ANA screening by IF, which does not detect certai
n anti-SSA/Ro-containing sera among patients with relevant autoimmune diagn
oses. Detection of anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, however, does not alone signify
cutaneous LE or SLE but adds weight to these diagnoses that should rely hea
vily on other clinical information.