This paper demonstrates the usefulness of aggregating information generated
from arrays of chemical sensors for improving the ability to discriminate
among target chemicals and their potential interferents. Two types of aggre
gation methods are evaluated; the first set do not compress the data, but i
ncorporate effects from neighboring sensors into the output of each sensor
in an array. The second method does result in compression of data and aggre
gates multiple sensor outputs into a single, more robust signal. Methods fo
r processing data and aggregating and smoothing outputs from arrays of tin-
oxide sensors are comparatively analyzed. Processing parameters studied inc
lude those related to simple averaging, linear-weighted averaging, and expo
nential smoothing across operating temperature and across type of sensing f
ilm in the dimensionality of the array. Aggregation techniques are evaluate
d during various stages of both the transient and steady-state response of
the array to quantify the early decision-making capability of the array ove
r that of a single or small number of unprocessed sensors. Aggregation stra
tegies are studied in combination, and results are extracted by quantitativ
ely measuring the goodness of clustering for each case. Cluster analysis, i
ncluding principal component analysis (PCA), is used to determine which of
these processing techniques are most effective.
It is shown that aggregation methods, whether they reduce transmission band
width or not, improve the performance of a 30-element, tin-oxide heterogene
ous sensor array in discriminating among common breath alcohol components (
ethanols), their interferents (acetone, formaldehyde, isopropyl), and a con
trast substance (ammonia). Aggregation generates a best-case 42% improvemen
t in separability of clusters and 6.25% improvement in the tightness of clu
sters. Results are shown that clearly demonstrate the usefulness of aggrega
tion in heterogeneous arrays among sensors whose outputs possess an appreci
ably degree of correlation (overlapping specificity). (C) 2000 Elsevier Sci
ence S.A. All rights reserved.