Background: The aim of this study was to reexamine the construct validity o
f the Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI) using new, independent data
from a population of patients and their carers. This involved re-testing th
e ECI within the stress-coping model, but adding new variables which includ
ed independently rated (rather than carer-rated) assessments of the patient
's symptoms and disabilities, a rating of social support (this time for the
patient rather than the carer) and a measure of a range of service inputs.
Method: Data were available on 69 patients and their carers from the PRiSM
Psychosis Study. Two regression analyses were performed; the first to esta
blish the extent to which the ECI predicted GHQ scores and the second to ex
amine predictors of the ECI selected from the wider dataset on the basis of
their likely relationship to carer appraisal. The second regression analys
is was performed in two stages, allowing the effect of service factors to b
e assessed after controlling for the impact of patient personal characteris
tics such as illness-related or environmental factors. Results: ECI scores
accounted for 27% of the variance of GHQ scores. Over one-third of the ECI
negative appraisal can be explained by a combination of patient disability
(the Social Behaviour Score Total), extent of patients' social network (Soc
ial Network Schedule: Number of Friends)and involvement of a Community Psyc
hiatric Nurse (CPN). At the same level of patient morbidity and informal so
cial network, CPN contact reduced ECI scores. Conclusion: As hypothesised,
ECI scores correlated significantly with the other measures in the directio
ns predicted by the stress-coping model; that is, negative caregiving as me
asured by the ECI predicted carer morbidity, while it in turn was predicted
by a combination of stressor variables (patient symptoms and disability) a
cting to increase it, and mediating variables (social support, service inpu
ts) acting to reduce it. Implications for services are discussed.